A Severe Covid Patient Produces More Virus Than All Children In America Combined
Children were never a danger to society - Covid Myth Buster
For my first post on Substack, I wanted to debunk one of the most preposterous assertions of Team Apocalypse: The fallacy that children are a danger to society and to grandma. I will demonstrate it’s quite the contrary.
I will not dive into the rationale for the intolerable crime against humanity committed on our children throughout the world these past two years. Is it senescent leaders afraid of dying who were ready to throw our kids under the bus? Is it simply a smokescreen because kids are defenceless? Is it an additional way to create panic in parents? The fact is that children have been accused of being the principal source of SARS-COV-2 and have been outrageously bullied because of that. It is ironic that those who feel at peace bullying our children are often the same righteous people who were tutoring against bullying practices at school a few years ago… The reality is that collectively children are least prone to propagating a toxic dose of SARS-COV-2: they carry the smallest viral load for the shortest duration. In fact, it is certain healthy1 children produce exponentially less than very elderly/sick persons with delayed immune responses.
I had addressed this extensively in my August article: “A Novel Perspective on a Not So Novel Virus”, highlighting the many differences in propagation dynamics between children and adults, summarised in the scheme below, and explaining why children can be natural vaccines more than anything else.
But, I hadn’t taken the time to prove how dramatic the difference was between a child mildly sick for a couple of days and an elderly carrying the virus for weeks.
In fact, a simple mathematical calculation using this duration and the SC2 propagation speed is sufficient to demonstrate the reality of who is poisonous to whom. And spoiler alert, it’s not the children.
THE REALITY IS THAT ONE SINGLE SEVERE COVID PATIENT CAN PRODUCE MORE VIRUS THAN ALL CHILDREN IN AMERICA. THAT’S FACTUAL.
Even considering infecting doses are the same - which we know they aren’t because LTCF patients cross-infect each other with very heavy inocula - a huge difference lies in the exponential propagation left untouched by the immune system in ageing or sick patients.
A recent study 2 estimated that the reproduction yield of SARS-COV-2 in the body to be 10x per 36/48 hours. In other words, a delay of 12 days in the immune reaction vs children could account for expansion - adjusting for obesity acceleration and for ACE2 differential - of nearly 100 million times. And that’s not adjusted for higher and repeated doses 100-1000x inocula…
In other words, all the healthy kids in America - distributed across the country - cannot together ever produce the amount of one single severe patient dying of COVID, let alone LTCF patients surrounded with hundreds of elderly each producing high viral loads.
Not only are kids not producing anywhere near what an immuno-senescent sick elderly produces, but they are widely dispersed and therefore the toxic consequences on the community cannot be not compared. To give you a comparison how ridiculous the policies against children are:
GOING AFTER CHILDREN IS LIKE CHASING AFTER A 5 KILOTON BOMB AND DECIDING TO GO AFTER ALL THE CHILDREN’S FIRECRACKERS IN AMERICA. IT IS BOTH INEFFECTIVE, VERY STUPID AND … DANGEROUS.
This is all the more infuriating when you see pictures of elderly politicians - all with dwindling health - ie ready-to-start virus mass-production machine- feasting unmasked while forcing on kids measures they don’t even apply to themselves… The focus should always have been on limiting the viral expansion, both at an individual level - through protocols3 to reduce propagation - and at a community level - through focused protection4 - notably within the retirement homes and hospitals.
There never was any rationale to limit the everyday lives of children, to gag them, to close down schools, to have them sit in glass cages or sit outside in the cold to eat their lunches.
Frankly, it all seems to have emerged from the dark minds of seriously deranged individuals with a lot of hate or fear in them. We might need to review who is taking care of our children in the years to come…mass hysteria cannot justify this level of inhumanity.
IN THE US, IN GERMANY AND IN SWEDEN5, NOT ONE HEALTHY CHILD DIED OF COVID IN 2 YEARS: ZERO !!
There never was any ethical or moral justification to impose anything on children. Children were never at risk with COVID. Imposing hardship on them was not only reckless, but utterly morally wrong as they have no possibility of consenting to these nightmarish measures. The idea that kids should sacrifice their lives - or their health - to bring peace of mind to a generation in age of dying is an enormous cognitive dissonance born out of a civilisation that has lost its bearings. Grand-parents and parents are here to protect children. That’s the way of the world, not the other way around. I’d encourage many to view the Justice videos6 of Professor Michael Sandel at Harvard. We, as a civilisation, have failed the litmus test in a grand way, and have a serious need for a moral recalibration.